Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction in Rhode v. Becerra

Gun Rights

Major Victory in Case Challenging Constitutionality of California’s Ammo Background Check Law

Fairfax, Va. - A major victory was secured on Thursday when a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in the NRA-supported case, Rhode v. Becerra. The case challenges the constitutionality of a California law that puts draconian restrictions on ammunition acquisition and transfers as a result of Prop 63 and SB 1235 (2016). 

As the court said, ‘The right to keep and bear arms is the insurance policy behind the right to life … a shield from the tyranny of the majority.’ California wasn’t just obstructing the people’s fundamental right to defend their families and lives—it was encouraging unlawful hostility toward an individual, Constitutional right,” said Jason Ouimet, executive director, National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action. “The NRA funded this case for the same reason the court struck down the laws: enough was enough.” 

The law required law-abiding citizens to undergo background checks when purchasing ammunition and for all transactions to occur in-person through a licensed ammunition vendor. 

You Might Like

Thursday’s injunction means the law cannot be enforced while the case is active unless the decision is stayed.

You Might Like

Articles You May Like

Hawaii Justices “Declare War” on U.S. Supreme Court, to the Cheers of Anti-Gun Media
Legislation Passes in Committee as Louisiana Races to Become 28th Constitutional Carry State
Corporals Corner Mid-Week Video #35 The DIY Packable Forged Skillet
Louisiana: Senate Committee to Hear Constitutional Carry Today
Don’t Miss This Powerful Video Pushing For Assault Rifle Ban

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *